I initially bought 2 of these discs from my local disc store, one was 176 grams in Tournament plastic, and one that was 171 grams in VIP plastic. After trying these 2 variations of the Bard out, I got my hands on a 180 gram VIP Bard as well.
Regarding the physical traits of the Bard, the mold kind of reminds me of a deeper and wider rimmed, slightly domier L64 Sinus with a higher parting line and a bit more pronounced bead. Although I know that normally this is a hit-or-miss type attribute, the depth and height of the Bard's rim fills the hand quite nicely; and although I have slightly larger hands, I wouldn't see the depth and height of the discs rim impeding on someone with smaller hands ability to feel comfortable and confident in gripping the Bard.
Unlike many discs that Westside makes, I feel that the stability in which Westside rates this disc is dead on. Before this disc was released, I looked at what InFlight rated the Bard, and because of this I was initially hoping for and almost expected the stability (not the glide, obviously) of the Bard to be very similar to my blunt nosed big bead gator, as InFlight made the high speed stability of the Bard appear to start turning left almost immediately after it left your hand. A few throws with this disc in both plastics later, I realized this wouldn't be the case. After this realization, I struggled to find a disc with a similar flight pattern; and then it hit me. The Bard is like a faster, slightly more stable Rancho Roc, or a Roc3 with a good amount more low speed fade (I've always felt the Roc3 didn't quite have the low speed fade to warrant a 3 rating, but I digress). In comparing the flight numbers of the Bard to the Roc or Roc3, this should have been what I expected.
When comparing the flight pattern of the Bard in both Tournament and VIP plastics, it's obvious that the Tournament plastic will be a bit less stable (both in terms of high speed turn and low speed fade), and this is exactly what I noticed when throwing the Bard in Tournament plastic. It is still quite stable, but if thrown with a lot of spin and power, the Tournament Bard will show just a hint of high speed turn, but I would still consider the zero rating for high speed turn to be accurate. The Tournament Bard also doesn't quite have as much low speed fade as it's VIP counterpart. Under these circumstances (high power and spin, or a really heavy wind), I would say the Tournament Bard would be a perfect substitute for a Roc3. If you throw the Tournament Bard with less power or spin, the Bard will be more high and low speed stable, showing just a hint of positive high speed turn, but again not enough to consider this disc anything other than zero in terms of high speed turn, finishing hard to the left (RHBH).
As I think most people would assume, the VIP plastic of this disc makes it have more high speed and low speed stability. If thrown with a lot of power and spin, or into a fierce headwind, the VIP Bard will hold whatever line you put it on during high speed flight, and always finish to the left; maybe not quite giving the Bard a 3 rating for low speed fade in this situation, but it'll still fade more than the mids I would give a 2 rating for low speed fade. When not thrown with a lot of power/spin/into a headwind, the Bard will hold a line for a little bit, show just a bit of positive high speed turn (much like a newer Firebird does before the fade really kicks in), and then finish really hard to the left.
My preferences usually lead me to using VIP/Opto/Lucid/Champion plastics, mainly due to aestetic reasons. In my opinion, this disc is the Trilogy's best answer to a faster Roc; and I am treating it as such by keeping a few Bards in different plastics, and eventually different amounts of wear in my bag.